November 14, 2061
I was sentenced to two years in prison and 15 years and 20 months in prison. Fraudulent.
On November 14, the court held the 61-year-old Ratchadaphisek Road criminal court in cooperation with Teachers Saving Cooperative Nonthaburi, Sakon Nakhon, and Ratchaburi. I read a scandal verdict with six black teachers at 3357/2557. , Yasothon and Kalasin, the plaintiffs are Devanee Ganesh Co., Ltd., Srisuk Rungvisa, former Senator, Kook or Mr. Kook Don Samran. Surasak Yasanguan, Manager of the Savings Association Council, Saving Member, Association of Thai Teachers is 6 defendants, with 110 executive committees, the defendants are between 1 and 10 persons. Fraudulent loans, public scams, collective fraud, joint property management of others. Corruption, depending on the usage … Fraud Public borrowing. And the Criminal Law sections 341, 342, 352, 353
On August 18 – November 12, the defendants deceived members and other co-operatives who were to buy lotteries for welfare. But it is not a lottery as a member's welfare in any way. The case was about 500 million baht during the investigation. During the withdrawal of the defendants 2, 4, 17, 30, 33, 37, 38, 59, and 8 defendants, the court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the 47 fatalities to the accused. Defendant 1, 3 (Srisuk Rungvisa), 8, 14 Escape, warrantee insurer Consideration of insurance temporarily available. In this class, 81 defendants were detained and the defendants were imprisoned in detention facilities in Paiao and Loei provinces. The court will send a judgment to read later.
While investigating evidence that the plaintiffs and defendants already had, the court dismissed 600,000 people and 79 defendants went to court. It is true. All manuscripts are corporations for the purposes of cooperative law. In 2010, Kasem Campbell (5) persuaded the co-teachers to conduct cooperative fund management seminars. Teacher co-operation money to create welfare for teachers. In this case, it is the responsibility of the co-op chairperson and the co-op chairperson that the defendant manages the money. According to the defendant, 1-2 companies have assigned lotteries to large corporations or associations of government lottery offices. The company will sell rights to cooperatives. This quota is to supply lotteries at member discounted prices. To become a member. Based on the lottery, the quota is 200-7 million. For your convenience we suggest that the company replace the lottery. The cooperative will be sold on its own. However, although the management fee of 100 baht per week was divided into about $ 100 million a year, the plaintiff later found that the defendants did not receive the money to buy the real lottery ticket. When the phone rang.
The plaintiff's witnesses represent cooperatives and investigators of the Special Investigation Department (DSI). The defendant company did not receive a drawing from the government. Other companies have only 15 books, but in the seminar there are 180,000 copies and sell them to members.
While the defendant attempted to fight, each action was determined by the decision of the cooperative committee itself. What is more helpful is the issue of cooperative management. I honestly believe this project can be done. Some of the victims have already returned money. This project shows profitability. The court testifies to the evidence that the accused plaintiff has committed fraud. The defendant 's actions are commission of misdemeanor. And cooperative managers of each cooperative. Designated for property management. I am dishonest and I have done my job wrong. In the first paragraph of Articles 353 and 343 of the Penal Code,
The judge jointly convicted five convicts on the basis of five-seven, nine-twelve five-year convicts, defendant 16, 18-29, 31-32, 34-36, 39-46 25 years. , 48-54, 76-90, 95-106. Each of the defendants was imprisoned for five years and the defendant was designated to deal with the other defendant's property. 55-58, 91-94, and 107-110 are assigned to property management. Some of Paul's useful things to consider. The defendant was sentenced to 1, 3, 5, 7, 9-12 including 15 years, 20 months, defendants 16, 18-29, 31-32, 34-36, 46, 48-54, 76-90, 102, 104-106, 6 years and 8 months, defendants 55-58, 91-94, 107-110 defendants two years, defendants 13, 15 dismissed. At 95-101, 103 the defendants will remain in prison in each of the same decades. 79 of the defendants sentenced the court to 400,000-800,000 baht in court for bail.