Since 2016 we have rumors of & # 39; next generation & # 39; graphics from AMD heard, in the form of the longest care Navi architecture. This year we finally received powerful evidence that graphical maps based on this architecture are at the road, and at the AMD game on the game E3, the first Navi products were developed.
The RX 5700 and the more powerful RX 5700 XT were the first products in the series, and so expected, this card was primarily collaborated on the middle segment.
This means that the most important competitors are Nvidia's RTX 2060 and RTX 2070 cards, such as the new Super variants of these. We haven't got this for testing, so it's the first mentioned cards that we primarily compare to this time.
Unlike the Nvidia cards mentioned, there is no form of ray tracing hardware in new AMD cards. On the other hand, AMD works on other things, especially by getting the cards to the new 7-nanometer production process. But, unlike Radeon VII, which is also built on 7 nanometers, the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT have a whole new architect: Navi, also known as RDNA 1.0. The last one contains a new instruction set and the GCN has been with us since 2012 with HD 7970.
This is especially important because the old Vega architect has been a leading force in AMD for several years. All Vega cards were both hotter, more expensive (good, a wild) than Nvidia's options, learning lesser achievements and – despite – grooves of great strength.
Believe me: I have a Vull 64 water cooler from start-up, and under load, the whole system will just turn 500 watts – about two of those of the equivalent option of Nvidia.
In other words, it's actually the energy efficiency of the new Navi cards that we're currently in, and the leap from 14 to 7 names production processes should surely produce results. Lower power consumption will result in less heat connection, which is the end result in less noise and higher performance In addition, we are naturally asked about performance and price. The last time AMD just disappeared days before the cards started, in response to Nvidia's start of the Super Cards.
|model||AMD RX 5700||AMD RX 5700 XT||Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti||Nvidia RTX 2060||Nvidia RTX 2070|
|architecture||RDNA 1.0||RDNA 1.0||Turing machine||Turing machine||Turing machine|
|Graphics process.||Navi 10 XL||Navi 10 XT||TU116||TU106-200||TU106-200|
|process||7 nm FF||7 nm FF||12 nm |
|12 nm FFN|
|chip size||251 mm²||251 mm²||284 mm²||445 mm²||445 mm²|
|core Frequency||1465 MHz||1605 MHz||1500 MHz||1365 MHz||1410 MHz|
|Boost frequency||1625 MHz||1755 MHz||1770 MHz||1680 MHz||1710 MHz|
|memory Frequency||14 GHz||14 GHz||12 GHz||14 GHz||14 GHz|
|memory type||8 GB GDDR6||8 GB GDDR6||6 GB|
|6 GB GDDR6||8 GB GDDR6|
|Minnebus||256 bit||256 bit||192-bit||192-bit||256-bit|
|bandwidth||448 GB / s||448 GB / s||288 GB / s||336 GB / s||448 GB / s|
|transistors||10.3 billion||10.3 billion||6.6 billion||10.8 billion||10.8 billion|
|Power connection||8 + 6-pin||8 + 6-pin||8 sticks||8 sticks||8 sticks|
|Typical consumption||180 W||225 W||120 W||160 W||185 W|
|launched||June 2019||June 2019||February 2019||January |
|From price (models with axial fans)||3700 kr||4300 kr||2700 kr||3500 kr||4400 kr|
AMD gives great value for money
In contrast to what we just do, in this test we only let the graphics cards we consider to consider the following competitors; If you want to see the matching numbers for other graphical cards, you will, for example, process this test.
This means that we include Nvidia's RTX 2060 and RTX 2070, the cards AMD even consider the RX 5700 and the RX 5700 XT respectively to keep performance, and the GTX 1660 Ti as the budget representative and GTX 1080 as the Used Market Representative .
The latter comes at the same price as the RX 5700 in one's used brand, and is also very accessible. And again: see numbers from other cards, so check our earlier tests.
The reason why we do not have any other AMD cards is to show the results of this test that you remove as, for example, a Radeon RX 570/580, not just the older card of the "red card" consider. Radeon VII has reached "end of life" at the moment.
That said, let's go directly to the performance graphs. Or, not exactly all performance graphs – if you want to see them you can create two pages, where & # 39; all the games we have normally tested have their own graphs for both 1080p, 1440p and 2160p.
Instead, we show the average fps of all matches:
As we see, the RX 5700 is just below our RTX 2060, and the RX 5700 XT is just under the RTX 2070. But this is a big "but" here: the new AMD cards are "blower-style" reference models "clothes, while the Nvidia cards are very covered and expensive. If we saw other people having tried the cards, the results would look as different as if we were the reference models of & # 39; have a RTX 2060 and RTX 2070 tested (what we do not have now).
In addition, it is expected – in contrast to AMD's earlier Vega card – many third-party models for the Navi cards, and these are normally both high and have much better cooling systems than the AMD reference models . Many variants are often cheaper.
Just the price here is a big point, for the RTX cards that we use in this test extremely Expensive compared to the cheaper variants you & # 39; ve also sold. For example, the MSX's RTX 2070 Gaming Z gets over 6,000 crowns, while the cheapest RTX 2070 can find it & # 39; we can now sell it for $ 4,400. This is very negative in NOK per fps graph below:
AMD's new card provides relatively high value for money, running at a level with Nvidia's GTX 1660 Ti. It is a wonder and means that the performance corresponds to the price AMD inscriptions. In addition, much money you get for the money increases with the resolution; RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT earn relatively better in 1440p and 2160p (4K) than the appropriate card from Nvidia.
So it should be said: with the lowest prices for both the RTX 2060 and the RTX 2070, the cards are only placed smaller over the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. The models you get for this price, of course, do much worse, and have much cheaper (and potentially less efficient) cooling systems.
At Away: The new AMD card has been postponed for the first time with PCIe 4.0 support. For & # 39; this does not have any kind of influences in games, we no longer see. Then you can go here.
Good build quality and neutral design – but a poor cooling solution
AMD & # 39; s new card looks and feels great. In particular, the RX 5700 has a very clean design, with matt and clean aluminum that will fit in virtually all systems. However, a pity is that AMD has no backplate; Here you see directly on the electronics. For the clean aesthetics, you may want to treat to keep the card fixed.
The RX 5700 XT, at the end, is more exciting, but also – according to the difference – a little, oh, curious. It's just one designBut if it's a good design is another thing.
Have you ever seen anyone who has seen the card commenting on it: did you lose it to & # 39; ground? But no, there is a bulk in a factory map, which if it has a function of two parts: see light, and leads the air to the graphics chip. The card has a backplate and is built only in aluminum, so there is just good build quality here – the design is just a little ordinary.
Both cards, however, have been designed as blazer styles, where the air is taken by one of the airmen and spits on & # 39; a back of a card. That just gives two things: sound and warm. And right: The RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT are both loud and warm:
However, they are far from loud as AMD's earlier Vega cards, and we only compare with other cards that have several major axial fans here. The temperatures of RX cards are also not alarming; They are where we expected this design to be. Therefore, we expect that when third-party models start up, they will have better results on both sound and heat.
We feel confident in this, not least because AMD has a lot of labels for the first time many times as much as Nvidia's recent card. This is so called by the new RDNA architecture and 7 Hanometer production processes. It's hard to imagine how important this is to AMD, because of the extreme power consumption of Vega cards outside of both sound, temperature and, not least, noise.
Regularly because of the cooling solution in AMD's reference models, we have decided to save the overclock until we try third-party issues for this time.
Are the Navi cards targeting e-sports?
As none of the games we simply test a piece like e-sports titles, we have decided to run a small new dispute in this test and make a separate sect for Fortnite. Of course, another argument for that is that Fortnite may be the most popular game in the world, and that we ourselves are our own professionals in & # 39; have a world here in norway.
The main argument is simply that the RX 5700 and the RX 5700 XT are priced in & # 39; fall into the sting of competitive esport. If you start steady 144 hz at 2560 x 1440 pixels or 240 hz at 1920 x 1080 pixels, start the cards at 3000 crowns and lift them to the minimum size.
In other words, the GTX 1660 Ti, RTX 2060 and RTX 2070 have so far been your best choice. Nvidia's cards have traditionally fared better than AMD's cards in Fortnite, as the game on Epic Games runs a notorious Nvidia-friendly Unreal Engine. However, Navi has an ace in its slot: the architect deals much more than Nvidia's Turing as AMD's former GCN-based card.
Does this result in Fortnite? To control, we race the RX 5700 and the RX 5700 XT against the RTX 2060 and RTX 2070, and performance deals with it in & # 39; a button from & # 39; s test. For these tests we used the league settings and copy the settings to one of & # 39; best players in & # 39; e world: Again (see photo). In an e-sport like Fortnite, probably, the most important and stable fps, not graphical beauty. Mostly we make the settings to make sure we test the graphics card and not the processor templates can release images on the screen, but in e-sports it is not so bad memory.
We played in regular solo matches with other players, but always land the same spot without players and started trying to land only. Both the landing and other players can lead to random and massive performance fluctuations, which we prevent.
The results show that AMD has no problem with the Unreal Engine, and that even the RX 5700 changes the RTX 2070 to 1080p as both combine with the Ryzen processor. In general, the result is very good for the AMD cards:
Another thing we have not yet achieved is that we have the new AMD cards both on our regular test rig (Intel Core i7 8700K @ 4.8 GHz) and on AMD's new Ryzen 9 3900X processor. Just for Fortnite, we also tested Nvidia's card on the new AMD platform.
We cannot draw very firm conclusions at this limited test, but some trends are possible to review. Looking at both the average numbers and numbers in Fortnite, AMD's new processor has a better performance than Intel's older Core i7 8700K. Especially in Fortnite the effects are large, and especially for Nvidia. The green is very good on AMD's new processor.
The 3900X processor is not overclocked. In other words, it is understandable that games are understood to be more common than six physical times, and that the 7-nanometer process in even new Ryzen processors also helps in games. We also see the 1% min value, which usually indicates how much the gaming experience is. With the Ryzen processor you will have an average stable experience as with Core i7 8700K – and higher fps. The exception is actually the combination of RX 5700 XT and 8700K; Here's the Intel processor delivering some better performance. The same does not apply to small brother RX 5700, so we know the reason for that.
conclusion – a new spring for AMD – and map is worth it (but wait)
So, what is the real rule here? Would you like to offer our AMD new card? The short answer is "yes". The RX 5700 and the RX 5700 XT have great potency and good performance, and have also praised Nvidia's knowing that it is now a little removed. This test – with AMD's reference card for fraudulent kitchen Nvidia cards – is also a "worst case scenario" for AMD – and they still get many of the tests. Combined with the fact that you get more fps for the money, it's just hard to advise AMD's new card. Then we make a small reservation so we don't even look at the super cards.
Away from what has been seen the problems with Vega and many of AMD's former GCN-based cards, and away (probably) also the issues are available. The RX 5700 XT and RX 5700 use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, which makes it easier and cheaper to use than the HBM2 memory they used earlier. There is also plenty of memory that the cards do not choose new games for years to come, causing the RTX 2060 to compete with its 6 GB.
The biggest argument for choosing green for women in this price program is whether you want extra features like beam tracking and DLSS slides. This is the functionality Nvidia has built in its cards and what AMD does not actively support. At the same time, there are still some surprisingly small percentages of games that use the RT and Tensor kernels of Nvidia's cards, and there are great results in beam tracking performance.
AMD also does what they call "FidelityFX" with the Navi cards, which, like DLSS, make it fun with mail processing – just without a kind of performance. You can choose to turn it on and off. The cards do well in both 1080p and 1440p, and in some titles, 60 fps can reach 4K, without actually viewing them on & # 39; settings. It is impressive, but if you want to play in 4K, you probably have to find some with a few more points to become a safe site.
The biggest monkey we want in this test is the following: waiting to buy the new AMD card for the third-party models. The current reference business is even hotter and lighter than necessary, so if you have a cabinet where axal fans are sound, we see a lot of reason for the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT in the current form upcoming third-party models. If you don't have a lot of time, then. Everywhere, on a general basis, the RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT are just big things – and a new spring for AMD.